“What’s Mine is Yours” Confessions of a former Sodomite
“What’s Mine is Yours” Confessions of a former Sodomite
Angelic beings are rarely politically correct. The angels visiting Lot didn’t wait around to file a sexual harassment lawsuit when the men of Sodom tried to pinch their booty. They just struck the suckers blind. All of them. And they didn’t even stop to check with God about it, either. Later God blew up the city. The Sodomites must have been very evil indeed, everyone agrees. But be forewarned. This story will come back to bite you. The truth is, you don’t have to proposition an angel to be a Sodomite. Simply turning your back on the poor earns you that label, according to the wisdom of the ancient rabbis. Now wait a minute, you’re thinking. Isn’t this line of reasoning just typical example of liberal obfuscation to blunt criticism of homosexuality? If only it were that simple, dear reader. (Obfuscation itself is illegal in several states, by the way). Clearly, the account in Genesis tells how a group of Sodom’s finest citizens thought nothing of trying to force Lot into turning over his angelic house guests for the crowd’s sexual amusement. But that was just a reflection of a deeper and more widespread corruption, according to Talmudic commentary. (Yes, kids, its time for more Talmud stories.) Sodom was infamous for being inhospitable, money-grubbing, prideful and selfish. And from God’s point of view, there’s a little bit of Sodom in all of us. One sage describes four types of people: “The one who says, ‘What is mine is mine, and what is yours is yours.’ This is the average person. “The one who says, ‘What is mine is yours, and what is yours is mine.’ This is the simpleton {and most of The Door’s readership–Editor}. “The one who says, ‘What is mine is yours, and what is yours is yours.’ This is the saintly person. “The one who says ‘ What is mine is mine and what is yours is mine.’ This is the wicked person.” But then, incredibly, one rabbi offers an opinion regarding the first example, the average man. “This one is the Sodomite.” (see Mishnah, Avot 5:10) Why the average man, and not the wicked person? His slogan could be taken directly from America’s corporate mission statement–“What is mine is mine and what is yours is yours.” An even playing field for entrepreneurship, democracy and civic cooperation. What could be bad about that? Jesus’ words in the Book of Revelation gave us a hint why such an attitude is so corrupt: “I would thou wert hot or cold.” The Sodomite slogan allows us to separate ourselves from community, use people, dismiss those in need, and abdicate any responsibility for being our brother’s keeper. As a recovering Sodomite, I know. I ran for the Texas Legislature back in the ’60s as a conservative Republican with practically no compassion for the poor. I despised them. I believed their problems were caused by laziness or some other uncorrectable character flaw. I justified my own greed with the “trickle-down” theory. Later, in a more compassionate mood, I served on the board of directors of the War on Poverty. But I found the problems of the poor defied all the political solutions. After I became a believer, our Christian community adopted a vow of poverty that echoes the attitude of the saint described in the Talmud. “Whatever I own that you need to own, you can have. Whatever you need that I don’t have, I’ll help you get.” The attributes of Sodom are described in Ezekiel 16:49: “…pride, fullness of bread and idleness, neither did she strengthen the hand of the poor.” Whenever the church abandons the poor, she turns into Sodom, and invokes God’s wrath. That’s why Jesus said “The poor you will always have with you.” Without a place to give, we would be sucked into the black hole of self-seeking. Sodom was the most beautiful of cities, populated by successful people, the best of the best. That’s why Lot chose to live there. It could have been any gated community in any American suburb. It probably had a great school system. It offered the most promising future for his children. It was safe. In Sodom, what’s mine is mine, and what’s yours is yours. One poignant Talmud story captures the failure of political solutions to poverty with surprising clarity. Charity was forbidden in Sodom because they believed it encouraged the proliferation of beggars. One day a beggar entered Sodom and approached a shopkeeper. He gave the beggar a small bar of gold, but first inscribed his name on it. The next person did the same. But no one would sell the beggar any food. They only gave him more gold bars inscribed with their names. The beggar finally died, loaded down with a bag of gold he couldn’t use. When his death became known, each Sodomite retrieved his own gold bar from the beggar’s bag. In that way they experienced the “joy of giving” without the cost. The poor don’t need our money, they need us to share our lives with them, our time, our homes, our skills and energies. Instead we give them money that buys nothing of real value. Another story especially speaks to those of us who are tempted to deal with the homeless and the needy as “clients” of a professional charitable organization. “Every visitor who came to Sodom was thrown into a bed. If he was tall, they put him on a small bed and hacked off his protruding feet. If he was short, they put him in a big bed and stretched his limbs out from head to feet until the dismembered body filled it up.” The temptation is to judge the needy, try to fix them, force them into a mold, constrain them with superfluous rules or make them fit the agenda we plan for them. But that is the way of Sodom. Taken to the extreme, it leads to ethnic cleansing and a holocaust for those who don’t meet our standards. The Talmud says Sodom’s final outrage was when a young girl was caught giving bread to a hungry stranger. She was tried and found guilty, stripped naked, daubed with honey and hung on a parapet of the city, where the bees consumed her. Her cry reached up to heaven, and God determined to destroy Sodom and its inhabitants. “Although the people of Sodom were guilty of all the sins, their fate was sealed against them only because they refused to give alms to the poor.” If Abraham had been able to find just 10 righteous men, Sodom would have been spared. Repentance is possible even in the cities of wickedness where we dwell. But the genuineness of our faith is determined by how we respond to those in need. ————– http://www.patheos.com/blogs/rogerwolsey/2012/02/mardi-gras-dont-be-a-sodomite/ IMO, sodomy isn’t something that republicans have a monopoly on. To the extent that we ignore the plight of the poor and oppressed in our communities and in our world — we’re all sodomites. Let’s repent. For those who wish to pursue these matters further, I recommend taking a look at pp.473-477 in Volume I (Genesis) of the New Interpreter’s Bible (Abingdon Press) and these documents too: http://www.soulforce.org/article/homosexuality-bible-walter-wink http://www.nytimes.com/ref/opinion/op-classic-gomes.html?ref=opinion&pagewanted=all minds.wisconsin.edu/bitstream/handle/1793/28252/koepnick.pdf? (really deep) http://www.elephantjournal.com/2010/11/cookies-of-love—a-liberal-seminarian-squares-off-with-a-fundamentalist/ I also speak to these matters in my new book, Kissing Fish,http://www.progressivechristianitybook.com Roger see also, Matthew 25:31-46 “When I feed the poor, they call me a saint, but when I ask why the poor are hungry, they call me a communist.” – Dom Helder Camara
http://www.patheos.com/blogs/rogerwolsey/2012/02/mardi-gras-dont-be-a-sodomite/
Angelic beings are rarely politically correct. The angels visiting Lot didn’t wait around to file a sexual harassment lawsuit when the men of Sodom tried to pinch their booty. They just struck the suckers blind. All of them. And they didn’t even stop to check with God about it, either. Later God blew up the city. The Sodomites must have been very evil indeed, everyone agrees. But be forewarned. This story will come back to bite you. The truth is, you don’t have to proposition an angel to be a Sodomite. Simply turning your back on the poor earns you that label, according to the wisdom of the ancient rabbis. Now wait a minute, you’re thinking. Isn’t this line of reasoning just typical example of liberal obfuscation to blunt criticism of homosexuality? If only it were that simple, dear reader. (Obfuscation itself is illegal in several states, by the way). Clearly, the account in Genesis tells how a group of Sodom’s finest citizens thought nothing of trying to force Lot into turning over his angelic house guests for the crowd’s sexual amusement. But that was just a reflection of a deeper and more widespread corruption, according to Talmudic commentary. (Yes, kids, its time for more Talmud stories.) Sodom was infamous for being inhospitable, money-grubbing, prideful and selfish. And from God’s point of view, there’s a little bit of Sodom in all of us. One sage describes four types of people: “The one who says, ‘What is mine is mine, and what is yours is yours.’ This is the average person. “The one who says, ‘What is mine is yours, and what is yours is mine.’ This is the simpleton {and most of The Door’s readership–Editor}. “The one who says, ‘What is mine is yours, and what is yours is yours.’ This is the saintly person. “The one who says ‘ What is mine is mine and what is yours is mine.’ This is the wicked person.” But then, incredibly, one rabbi offers an opinion regarding the first example, the average man. “This one is the Sodomite.” (see Mishnah, Avot 5:10) Why the average man, and not the wicked person? His slogan could be taken directly from America’s corporate mission statement–“What is mine is mine and what is yours is yours.” An even playing field for entrepreneurship, democracy and civic cooperation. What could be bad about that? Jesus’ words in the Book of Revelation gave us a hint why such an attitude is so corrupt: “I would thou wert hot or cold.” The Sodomite slogan allows us to separate ourselves from community, use people, dismiss those in need, and abdicate any responsibility for being our brother’s keeper. As a recovering Sodomite, I know. I ran for the Texas Legislature back in the ’60s as a conservative Republican with practically no compassion for the poor. I despised them. I believed their problems were caused by laziness or some other uncorrectable character flaw. I justified my own greed with the “trickle-down” theory. Later, in a more compassionate mood, I served on the board of directors of the War on Poverty. But I found the problems of the poor defied all the political solutions. After I became a believer, our Christian community adopted a vow of poverty that echoes the attitude of the saint described in the Talmud. “Whatever I own that you need to own, you can have. Whatever you need that I don’t have, I’ll help you get.” The attributes of Sodom are described in Ezekiel 16:49: “…pride, fullness of bread and idleness, neither did she strengthen the hand of the poor.” Whenever the church abandons the poor, she turns into Sodom, and invokes God’s wrath. That’s why Jesus said “The poor you will always have with you.” Without a place to give, we would be sucked into the black hole of self-seeking. Sodom was the most beautiful of cities, populated by successful people, the best of the best. That’s why Lot chose to live there. It could have been any gated community in any American suburb. It probably had a great school system. It offered the most promising future for his children. It was safe. In Sodom, what’s mine is mine, and what’s yours is yours. One poignant Talmud story captures the failure of political solutions to poverty with surprising clarity. Charity was forbidden in Sodom because they believed it encouraged the proliferation of beggars. One day a beggar entered Sodom and approached a shopkeeper. He gave the beggar a small bar of gold, but first inscribed his name on it. The next person did the same. But no one would sell the beggar any food. They only gave him more gold bars inscribed with their names. The beggar finally died, loaded down with a bag of gold he couldn’t use. When his death became known, each Sodomite retrieved his own gold bar from the beggar’s bag. In that way they experienced the “joy of giving” without the cost. The poor don’t need our money, they need us to share our lives with them, our time, our homes, our skills and energies. Instead we give them money that buys nothing of real value. Another story especially speaks to those of us who are tempted to deal with the homeless and the needy as “clients” of a professional charitable organization. “Every visitor who came to Sodom was thrown into a bed. If he was tall, they put him on a small bed and hacked off his protruding feet. If he was short, they put him in a big bed and stretched his limbs out from head to feet until the dismembered body filled it up.” The temptation is to judge the needy, try to fix them, force them into a mold, constrain them with superfluous rules or make them fit the agenda we plan for them. But that is the way of Sodom. Taken to the extreme, it leads to ethnic cleansing and a holocaust for those who don’t meet our standards. The Talmud says Sodom’s final outrage was when a young girl was caught giving bread to a hungry stranger. She was tried and found guilty, stripped naked, daubed with honey and hung on a parapet of the city, where the bees consumed her. Her cry reached up to heaven, and God determined to destroy Sodom and its inhabitants. “Although the people of Sodom were guilty of all the sins, their fate was sealed against them only because they refused to give alms to the poor.” If Abraham had been able to find just 10 righteous men, Sodom would have been spared. Repentance is possible even in the cities of wickedness where we dwell. But the genuineness of our faith is determined by how we respond to those in need. ————– http://www.patheos.com/blogs/rogerwolsey/2012/02/mardi-gras-dont-be-a-sodomite/ IMO, sodomy isn’t something that republicans have a monopoly on. To the extent that we ignore the plight of the poor and oppressed in our communities and in our world — we’re all sodomites. Let’s repent. For those who wish to pursue these matters further, I recommend taking a look at pp.473-477 in Volume I (Genesis) of the New Interpreter’s Bible (Abingdon Press) and these documents too: http://www.soulforce.org/article/homosexuality-bible-walter-wink http://www.nytimes.com/ref/opinion/op-classic-gomes.html?ref=opinion&pagewanted=all minds.wisconsin.edu/bitstream/handle/1793/28252/koepnick.pdf? (really deep) http://www.elephantjournal.com/2010/11/cookies-of-love—a-liberal-seminarian-squares-off-with-a-fundamentalist/ I also speak to these matters in my new book, Kissing Fish,http://www.progressivechristianitybook.com Roger see also, Matthew 25:31-46 “When I feed the poor, they call me a saint, but when I ask why the poor are hungry, they call me a communist.” – Dom Helder Camara
http://www.patheos.com/blogs/rogerwolsey/2012/02/mardi-gras-dont-be-a-sodomite/
